An introductory definition of attachment from the DMM perspective, and why it is relevant to legal (and other relational) professionals.
An ICCI whitepaper. Mark Baumann, © 2017
Attachment theory is complex and it can be hard to find a comprehensive definition that is effective for practitioners. Attachment is often described as involving a child who seeks safety from a parent, and a parent who provides safety and who supports a child’s exploration. It can also describe a unique relationship between any two people who rely on each other for safety, such as spouses, and clients and professionals. The Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation (DMM), initially developed by Dr. Patricia Crittenden, shifts the focus of attachment slightly and centers it around danger rather than safety: Attachment involves a person’s (child or adult) need to be protected from danger, and comforted especially after exposure to danger. Focusing on just this aspect of attachment provides tremendous insight into parenting, love relationships, and relationships between relational professionals (such as lawyers) and their clients. In one form or another, clients seek out professionals to protect them from some form of danger.
But attachment involves much more than a relationship because it contributes significantly to the development of (usually) life long thinking and behavior patterns which tend to be utilized or preferred in the context of danger.
NxR=E. Taking a cue from the simplistic formula GxE (the interplay of Genes and Environment), we can think of attachment in simple terms as NxR=E: attachment involves the interplay of Needs and Relationship which lead to certain Effects. Attachment involves certain neurobiologically driven Needs, a Relationship between a person (child or adult) who needs protection and a person who can provide protection (Attachment Figure), and Effects which include the development of particular behavior and thought patterns (protection strategies). The Effects of the interplay between Needs and Relationship are on the development of the body’s neural (and probably endocrine) systems. Danger involves a broad array of things, including objective dangers like starvation, rejection, and assault, but it also leads to subjective perceptions of danger. For example, for some people being alone is dangerous and for others it is safe, and for some struggling over an issue is safe while for others it is a danger. People involved in litigation almost always face danger in the form of some sort of potential loss (and many mental health clients likewise are facing danger, loss, and trauma) while lacking strategies to effectively manage fear and loss.
Because attachment is centered on obtaining protection from danger, one of its effects is to promote Self-Protective (behavior) Strategies. People, including infants and young children, develop behavioral strategies that minimize danger and maximize relative safety within the attachment relationship. Attachment strategies may provide safety in a child’s parenting environment, but the use of the same strategies at school or in interpersonal relationships may be ineffective or problematic. Of the many SPSs people may develop, some include avoiding (A strategies) or drawing (C strategies) attention to oneself, a tendency to rely on the self (A) or others (C), and distancing/idealizing/caregiving others (A) or oscillating some level of anger with some level of feigned helplessness (C).
More interesting and complex, attachment impacts cognition, leading to identifiable Patterns of Information Processing, or the way in which neural systems manage the process of handling information. Everything in the world represents a piece or set of information. In terms of attachment, information processing involves becoming aware of and processing information in the environment which might present danger. Information is processed in several stages which involve at least perceiving, receiving (allowing it into awareness, or not), evaluating (determining if it is useful to predict danger, or not), retaining (keeping or discarding the information), and recall (which may involve all, parts, none, or transformed information). Information can be distorted or transformed (changed in some way) at any stage of processing. Attachment deeply impacts the development of PIPs. Of the many impacts on PIPs, some include minimizing or eliminating (A) or maximizing (C) negative affect, using an overly narrow and rigid (A) or overly broad and vague (C) set of facts to make decisions, and appearing to lack memory and relying on semantic conclusions (A) or recalling too much and relying on imaged memory and connotative language (C) to describe and analyze issues.
Dr. Patricia (Pat) Crittenden studied under attachment pioneers John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, and spent a career taking their ideas to new heights. Like Bowlby and other attachment and non-attachment theorists, she realized that attachment measures uncover information processing patterns which provide rich insight into many aspects of human functioning. The DMM, consistent with many other theories, describes how information processing can be fundamentally divided into a preference for cognitive (A) and affective (C) oriented processing. Her decades of research in attachment measures led her to gain a unique and deep insight into the detailed facets of SPSs and PIPs, cutting through behaviors and thoughts that are less relevant to decision making and focusing on what matters to provide useful insight for relational professionals to help clients expand decision making ability.
The DMM’s identification of patterns of information processing, behavioral self-protective strategies, and the impacts on memory function, which are all organized around neurobiological drives to obtain protection from danger, all combine to provide a powerful foundation for a model of conflict psychology. ICCI uses the DMM as a foundation to build the Conflict Model of personality, adding in or clarifying additional elements and insights from other fields such as Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB).
Crittenden’s DMM in part strengthens the understanding of the basic ABC patterns of attachment, and also parses them into much finer gradations. (ABC+D, the traditional attachment model parses 11 patterns and the DMM parses 23.) The DMM, like IPNB, is a neuropsychological meta-model, incorporating many fields of study such as biology, neurology, genetics, temperament, memory, sociobiology, developmental psychology, learning theory, systems theory, theory of mind, etc., and as such, it provides a robust model for understanding how and why people act the way do when faced with danger and conflict. Once it’s understood that attachment leads to two primary ways of being in the world, it becomes clear that professionals can understand and adjust their own patterns to best work with clients. Likewise, parents can learn to adjust their own parenting styles and techniques to optimize their child’s neural development.
NxR=E is a concept developed within the framework of the Integrative Client Counseling Model (ICCM), and is not part of any traditional attachment approach, yet it seems to capture the essence of what all attachment approaches are generally describing and provides a practical framework to at least help expand thinking about what “attachment” is. (Even Bowlby was looking for a more inclusive term. Bowlby, Attachment and Loss, Vol III, 1980.) The DMM and the ABC+D models expand attachment, but only the DMM offers a comprehensive, published, and coherent model to help professionals meaningfully apply attachment and it’s impacts in adult contexts.
More information on attachment and the DMM can be found at www.PatCrittenden.com (including free article access and book references), www.familyrelationsinstitute.com (FRI), www.iasa-dmm.org, and at the Integrative Client Counseling Institute, www.ICC.Institute. Resources and training for Interpersonal Neurobiology can be found here. FRI offers training programs in attachment theory and measures. NCAST at the University of Washington offers FRI and other attachment training programs. ICCI offers training programs for lawyers, mental health and parenting professionals, and other relational professionals.
Recent Posts
- ICCI Welcomes sister site: Conflict Science Institute
- Attachment evidence and expert testimony are reliable and admissible using the DMM and IASA Family Attachment Court Protocol
- CLE: Attachment and conflict psychology – Bellingham 9/17/18
- Presentation: DMM clinician tools, from a lawyer’s perspective – Florence IT, 6/13/18
- Study: Common brain parasites can change conflict-relevant personality function -Toxoplasma Gondii